human rights
FREE NEWS LINKS

photo of U.S. Capitol Building  
      HOME 
  SEARCH

Updates & changes ongoing ....

---- Although this site is https-secure, we cannot guarantee that it or any provided links are safe; be sure your antivirus and other security systems are up to date.

Also see: China; Saudi Arabia; Philippines; Venezuela;

            
   Jump to:  2016;    2017;   2018;    2019;   2020; 

Undated: Human rights in the United States
comprise a series of rights which are legally protected by the Constitution of the United States, including the amendments,[1][2] state constitutions, conferred by treaty and customary international law, and enacted legislatively through Congress, state legislatures, and state referenda and citizen's initiatives. Federal courts in the United States have jurisdiction over international human rights laws as a federal question, arising under international law, which is part of the law of the United States.[3]

The human rights record of the United States of America is a complex matter with varying opinion first and foremost the Federal Government of the United States has, through a ratified constitution, guaranteed unalienable rights to citizens of the country, and also to some degree, non-citizens. These rights evolved over time through constitutional amendments, supported by legislation and judicial precedent. Along with the rights themselves, the periphery of the population who had access to these rights has expanded over time. Today, the United States has a vibrant civil society and strong constitutional protections for many civil and political rights.[4]

On a number of human rights issues, the United States has been internationally criticized for its human rights record, including the least protections for workers of most Western countries,[5] the imprisonment of debtors,[6] and the criminalization of homelessness and poverty,[7][8][9] the invasion of the privacy of its citizens through surveillance programs,[10] police brutality,[11][12] police impunity,[13] the incarceration of citizens for profit, the mistreatment of prisoners and juveniles in the prison system, having the longest prison sentences of any country, being the last Western country with a death penalty, abuses of illegal immigrants,[14] including children,[15][16][17] facilitating state terrorism[18] and the continued support for foreign dictators who commit abuses (including genocide),[19][20] forced disappearances, extraordinary renditions, extrajudicial detentions, torture of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay and black sites, and extrajudicial targeted killings (Disposition Matrix).[10][21][22][23]

Some observers give the U.S. high[24] to fair[25] marks on human rights, while others charge it with a persistent pattern of human rights violations.[26][27][28][29]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_the_United_States
-- 2016 --
Back to top
Undated / updates ongoing:  Trump Human Rights Tracker

A collaboration between Columbia Law School’s Human Rights Institute, Human Rights Clinic, and the Columbia Human Rights Law Review

To aid journalists, civil society organizations, and the general public, the Columbia Human Rights Law Review and Columbia Law School’s Rightslink, Human Rights Clinic, and Human Rights Institute have launched this regularly updated tool to keep track of the Executive Branch’s actions and their impacts on human rights. It summarizes the action taken by the administration, identifies the human rights implications, and provides links to sources where readers can find more detailed analysis.

Input from those using this tool is welcome at trumphumanrights@gmail.com.
http://hrlr.law.columbia.edu/the-trump-human-rights-tracker/
-- 2017 --

Back to top


Ongoing updates: Trump Administration Civil and Human Rights Rollbacks
https://civilrights.org/trump-rollbacks/

January 14: Human Rights Watch lists Trump as threat to human rights

Human Rights Watch is listing President-elect Donald Trump as a threat to human rights, calling his campaign a “vivid illustration of the politics of intolerance.”

“Donald Trump’s election as US president after a campaign fomenting hatred and intolerance, and the rising influence of political parties in Europe that reject universal rights, have put the postwar human rights system at risk,” the group said in a Friday statement announcing a new report.

The 687-page World Report analyzes Trump’s campaign, pointing to his rhetoric as a cause for worry over human rights violations.

“(Trump’s) campaign floated proposals that would harm millions of people, including plans to engage in massive deportations of immigrants, to curtail women’s rights and media freedoms, and to use torture,” the report says, quoting Human Rights Watch Executive Director Kenneth Roth.
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/314329-human-rights-org-lists-trump-as-threat-to-human-rights

April 2: Trump signals he won't press human rights ahead of key diplomatic week

President Donald Trump will come face-to-face with the leaders of two nations accused of grave human rights abuses in a spate of high-level talks with foreign counterparts this week.

It will be the first in-person opportunity for the new US leader to confront those issues as commander-in-chief. Initial signs, however, indicate Trump will say little on the matter during his talks with the Presidents of Egypt and China, at least in public, a dramatic shift away from the human rights practices of previous administrations.

"Our approach is to handle these types of sensitive issues in a private, more discrete way," a White House official said Friday, previewing Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi's visit to the White House on Monday. "We believe it's the most effective way to advance those issues to a favorable outcome."

US presidents have long been forced to balance their public outcry on human rights transgressions with the risk of alienating important US partners. The outcome is rarely wholly appealing to human rights advocates, who argue a president has unparalleled ability to sway another country's thinking.
https://www.cnn.com/2017/04/02/politics/donald-trump-human-rights-china-china/index.html

Back to top

April 26: USA: 100 ways Trump has threatened human rights in first 100 days

As the first 100 days of President Donald Trump’s administration come to a close, Amnesty International has compiled a list of 100 ways the Trump administration has tried to threaten human rights in the USA and around the world – sometimes succeeding, and sometimes being blocked by a powerful and growing resistance movement.

“These first 100 days show how dangerous Trump’s agenda is, and they’re also a roadmap for how to stop it and protect human rights in the USA and around the world,” said Margaret Huang, executive director of Amnesty International USA.

“When we sat down to document the first 100 days, it didn’t take long to identify 100 ways this administration has threatened people’s human rights. What’s incredible isn’t just all the ways the Trump administration has tried to deny people freedom, justice, and equality – but all the ways that the public has pushed back and refused to let it happen.”

“Whether it’s closing our borders, turning our backs on refugees, trying to ban Muslims from the USA, or emboldening human rights abusers worldwide, President Trump seems intent on stoking the fires of conflict outside US borders while closing the door to those fleeing violence,” said Huang.

“We have learned that when we come together and fight back, we can make a difference. The Trump administration’s ongoing threats to human rights remain – but so does the resolve to defeat them.”
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2017/04/usa-100-ways-trump-has-threatened-human-rights-in-first-100-days/
  
November 14: 'Human Rights Are Largely Irrelevant to the Emerging Trump Doctrine'

The president’s Asia tour reveals just how little such ideals factor into his vision.
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/11/trump-human-rights-asia-trip/545843/
-- 2018 --

Back to top
March 25: Donald Trump Has Been True to His Word on Human Rights

His friendships with the world’s most notorious autocrats tell us everything we need to know. 
https://www.thenation.com/article/donald-trump-has-been-true-to-his-word-on-human-rights/

June 21: President Donald J. Trump is Standing Up for Human Rights at the U.N.

Ending the human rights council farce: President Donald J. Trump and his Administration have taken a stand for human rights and withdrawn from the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC).

Failing to fulfill its purpose: The HRC has failed to live up to its purpose, serving as a shield for human rights violators and a megaphone for unfair bias against Israel.

Countries with poor human rights records are routinely elected to the HRC, and use it to shield themselves from criticism and impede efforts to address their terrible records ... The HRC includes elected members such as Venezuela, Cuba, Burundi, China, and the Democratic Republic of Congo—countries that have been called out for their continual human rights violations and abuses.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-standing-human-rights-u-n/

July 9: For the first 18 months, Donald Trump’s administration has systematically deprioritised human rights — driven largely by the president’s disinterest, ‘America first’ transactionalism, and ‘pattern of appreciation for strongman-type leaders’.1 This is a major departure from previous presidencies, both Republican and Democrat. Since President Carter, human rights and democracy promotion have been a constant, if selectively pursued, part of US foreign policy. Successive administrations have weighed human rights concerns among US national interests and stressed that the United States has a role to play in human rights and democracy promotion globally.

Trump’s national security cabinet has paid scant attention to human rights (apart from US Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley’s rhetorical focus) and elevated the promotion of immediate economic and security interests over civil and political freedoms.2 When human rights have been considered, they have generally been viewed instrumentally, to serve a short-term security purpose. The administration has also recently withdrawn from the UN Human Rights Council, citing its failure to reform and anti-Israel resolutions.3 As the Trump White House has pulled back from human rights promotion — and multilateral engagement — China, Russia and other states have grown more assertive in challenging human rights and democratic norms at home, globally and multilaterally.4
https://www.ussc.edu.au/analysis/human-rights-and-the-trump-administration

December 11: Trump Is Failing on Human Rights

It is time to restore truth and moral clarity in the White House
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/trump-failing-human-rights-38437
-- 2019 --    

Back to top
February 19: Trump administration launches global effort to end criminalization of homosexuality

The administration is responding in part to a reported hanging of a young gay man in Iran, Trump’s top geopolitical foe.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/trump-administration-launches-global-effort-end-criminalization-homosexuality-n973081

February 21: Trump-Kim Summit Seen Unlikely to Touch on Human Rights
https://www.voanews.com/a/trump-kim-summit-seen-unlikely-to-touch-on-human-rights/4797683.html

February 28: Trump Smiling With Kim Jong Un on the World Stage Shows His Disdain for Human Rights

What a reversal from the beginning of the Trump Administration, when Trump got in front of the U.S. Congress and pronounced his commitment to ensure freedom for the North Korean people. He did the same in front of the National Assembly in Seoul. Both instances took place before Trump and Kim “fell in love.” Time and time again, Trump continues to laud and relish his personal chemistry with Kim at the expense of spotlighting relentless and grave human rights violations. In Hanoi, he even took Kim’s words at face value concerning the death of the American citizen, Otto Warmbier.

Despite opening up to the outside world to discuss denuclearization and economic cooperation, North Korea has yet to show solid evidence of any improvements in its dire human rights record. There is no sign that grave and systematic human rights violations such as arbitrary detention, torture and other ill-treatment, enforced disappearances, are ending in the country. Some of these may amount to crimes against humanity. Judge Thomas Buergenthal, a co-author of a 2017 report from the International Bar Association War Crimes Committee, survived Auschwitz and said North Korea’s labor camps are as bad as those run by the Nazis.
http://time.com/5541216/trump-kim-human-rights-north-korea/

March 5: President Trump Raises Otto Warmbier Human Rights Case in Hanoi

At a press conference following the ill-fated summit in Hanoi last week, President Donald Trump was asked whether the case of U.S. student Otto Warmbier was discussed with North Korean Leader Kim Jong-un. Warmbier was returned to his parents in June 2017 after having been imprisoned in North Korea for 17 months. He returned in a condition that medical professionals called “unresponsive wakefulness,” and he died a few days later. The president said he had raised the issue:

[Trump]: And I did speak about it, but I don’t believe he [Kim Jong-un] would have allowed that to happen. It just wasn’t to his advantage to allow that to happen.
https://www.csis.org/analysis/president-trump-raises-otto-warmbier-human-rights-case-hanoi

Back to top

March 6: President Trump Revokes Reporting Requirement on Lethal Strikes

The revoked provision in Executive Order 13732 on civilian casualties required an annual report on the total number of strikes by all United States government entities, not just the military, outside areas of active hostilities as well as the number of civilian and combatant deaths caused by those strikes. Congressionally-mandated reporting is limited to the assessed number of civilian casualties resulting from military operations. 
https://www.humanrightsfirst.org/press-release/president-trump-revokes-reporting-requirement-lethal-strikes

March 13: The State Department acknowledges Saudi Arabia’s killing of U.S. resident Jamal Khashoggi in its annual human rights report but makes no mention of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in the section on his death. That’s despite reports that the CIA determined the Saudi leader ordered Khashoggi’s assassination.

The Trump administration has long resisted implicating the crown prince in the murder, citing what it says is insufficient evidence.

Trump said in November that he stood with Saudi Arabia because spoiling relations could negatively impact oil prices, the U.S.′ plan to counter Iran in the Middle East and a promise to buy U.S.-made arms. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, however, told CNBC in January that oil prices would not affect America’s response to the Khashoggi killing.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/13/state-department-calls-jamal-khashoggis-death-human-rights-violation.html

March 14: Tribunal Declares Trump and Duterte Guilty of Crimes Against Humanity

Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte and his government committed war crimes and crimes against humanity, aided and abetted by U.S. President Donald Trump and his administration, according to a recent ruling from the International Peoples’ Tribunal on the Philippines.

The tribunal, which was held in Brussels, Belgium, on September 18 and 19, 2018, rendered its 84-page decision on these crimes on March 8. Conveners of the tribunal included the International Association of Democratic Lawyers, European Association of Lawyers for Democracy and World Human Rights, Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers, IBON International, and the International Coalition for Human Rights in the Philippines. A panel of eight jurors from Egypt, France, Italy, Malaysia, the Netherlands and the United States heard testimony from 31 witnesses...
https://truthout.org/articles/tribunal-declares-trump-and-duterte-guilty-of-crimes-against-humanity/

Back to top

March 17: Trump Administration Omitted Women's Reproductive Rights from the Annual Human Rights Report
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/3/17/1842847/-Trump-Administration-Omitted-Women-s-Reproductive-Rights-from-the-Annual-Human-Rights-Report?

March 18: Trump administration ignoring human rights monitors, ACLU tells UN

The Trump administration is coming under fire for its refusal to engage with international human rights monitors over potential violations inside the US, from police brutality and executions to the abuse of migrant children at the border.

Protests have poured in from organisations objecting to the government’s virtual boycott of established systems designed to protect human rights, after the US withdrew from the United Nations human rights council last year. Washington is accused of rebuffing official complaints from monitors, undermining human rights bodies and threatening officials with prosecution should they step foot on US soil.

The latest condemnation has come from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which has delivered a scathing appraisal to the Human Rights Council (HRC) in Geneva. The ACLU charged that over the past year “the Trump administration has escalated its hostility towards human rights bodies including the apparent severing of relationships with independent experts appointed to monitor and report on human rights violations”.

The ACLU statement, submitted by director of human rights Jamil Dakwar, noted that under Trump the US has not extended a single invitation to UN experts to visit the country as part of routine oversight. It notes that the UN expert on the human rights of migrants has asked repeatedly to be allowed to visit the US-Mexican border, given the serious deterioration of treatment of undocumented migrants, to no avail.

In January, the Guardian revealed that the US government had ceased to cooperate with tried and tested international procedures, in a move which threatened the nation’s standing as a beacon of good practice on the world stage. At that point, the state department had failed to respond to 13 complaints by UN monitors raising fundamental questions about America’s commitment to international law.

The number of unanswered requests from the UN’s so-called “special rapporteurs” has risen to 22. The last such demand that received a reply from any Trump official was in May last year.
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2019/mar/18/trump-administration-ignoring-human-rights-monitors-aclu
-- 2020 --

Back to top   










 Webpage visitor counts provided by
StatCounter


 

 

copyr 2018 trump-news-history.com, Minneapolis, MN